Population fitness measurements collected for Acartia hudsonica during multigenerational exposure to ocean warming (OW), ocean acidification (OA), and combined ocean warming and acidification (OWA) from 2017-07-02 to 2018-08-15 (NCEI Accession 0294372)
This dataset contains biological data collected from 2017-07-02 to 2018-08-15. These data include fecundity, reproduction rate, and survival probability. These data were collected by Hannes Baumann, Hans G. Dam, and Michael Finiguerra of University of Connecticut and Melissa Pespeni and Reid Brennan of University of Vermont as part of the "Collaborative Research: Response of marine copepods to warming temperature and ocean acidification (Copepod Response to Warming Temp and OA)" project. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2024-04-05.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Ocean warming & acidification experiment: Acartia hudsonica population fitness
Dataset Description:
Methods and Sampling:
Three hundred copepods were collected in April of 2018 from eastern Long Island Sound, Connecticut, USA (41.3°N, 72.0°W) and raised for one year (~12 generations) (14 degrees Celsius (°C), 400 microatmospheres (μatm) CO2, 30 ‰ salinity, 12:12 hours light:dark) as stock cultures to limit maternal effects (Falconer, 1989, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics ). Three resulting stock cultures with >2,000 individuals each were combined and then split evenly into three groups for each of the four treatments. Groups were acclimatized within a generation to temperature (15°C or 13°C, 1°C per day) and pCO2 (1000 μatm, 100 μatm per day, OA treatments only). Groups seeded the F0 individuals for 7-10 days yielding ~15,000 eggs per treatment. Resulting F0 eggs and nauplii were combined for each treatment, redistributed among three replicate cultures, and returned to their respective experimental conditions. The experimental environmental conditions were: 1) Ambient control (AM): 13°C, 400 µatm CO2, pH = 8.2; 2) Ocean Acidification (OA): 13°C, 1000 µatm CO2, pH = 7.85; 3) Ocean Warming (OW): 15°C, 400 μatm CO2, pH = 8.2; 4) Combined warming and acidification (OWA): 15°C, 1000 μatm CO2, pH = 7.85. Copepods were fed equal proportions of the live phytoplankters Tetraselmis sp., Rhodomonas sp., and T halassiosira weissflogii every 48-72 hours to achieve food-replete conditions (≥600 micrograms (μg) Carbon per liter (L)) (Feinberg and Dam, 1998. Marine Ecology Progress Series ), deliberately raised under ambient conditions to avoid confounding effects of possible food quality changes.
The population net reproductive rate, λ, was calculated as the dominant eigenvalue of an assembled projected age-structured Leslie matrix constructed from survival and fecundity data (Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation ). Briefly, day-specific probabilities of survival are calculated from day-specific survival as Px = lx / (lx-1) where lx represents the proportion of individuals on day x and lx - 1 represents the proportion of individuals on day x - 1. Probabilities of survival on day 1 are assumed to be 100%, or a value of 1.0. Per capita EPR and HS are calculated as described in the preceding, with fecundity rates equalling the product of EPR and HS. Because only females produce offspring, total fecundity rates must be scaled to the sex ratio (proportion of females to males). To account for differences in individual development time for each treatment, fecundity rates are assigned to all days after the first matured adult is observed. We assume that surviving individuals represented by the survival experiments are equally as likely to experience any of the fecundity values observed in EPR experiments. Therefore, each mate-pair fecundity rate was paired with each survival beaker to construct a matrix. This yields a maximum of 120 matrices per treatment per generation (3 survival beakers × 4 replicate cultures × 10 mate pairs). Full methods for all traits can be found in: deMayo, et al. 2023. Simultaneous warming and acidification limit population and reveal phenotype costs for a marine phenotype. Proc. R. Soc. B 290: 20231033. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1033
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Ocean warming & acidification experiment: Acartia hudsonica population fitness
Dataset Description:
Methods and Sampling:
Three hundred copepods were collected in April of 2018 from eastern Long Island Sound, Connecticut, USA (41.3°N, 72.0°W) and raised for one year (~12 generations) (14 degrees Celsius (°C), 400 microatmospheres (μatm) CO2, 30 ‰ salinity, 12:12 hours light:dark) as stock cultures to limit maternal effects (Falconer, 1989, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics ). Three resulting stock cultures with >2,000 individuals each were combined and then split evenly into three groups for each of the four treatments. Groups were acclimatized within a generation to temperature (15°C or 13°C, 1°C per day) and pCO2 (1000 μatm, 100 μatm per day, OA treatments only). Groups seeded the F0 individuals for 7-10 days yielding ~15,000 eggs per treatment. Resulting F0 eggs and nauplii were combined for each treatment, redistributed among three replicate cultures, and returned to their respective experimental conditions. The experimental environmental conditions were: 1) Ambient control (AM): 13°C, 400 µatm CO2, pH = 8.2; 2) Ocean Acidification (OA): 13°C, 1000 µatm CO2, pH = 7.85; 3) Ocean Warming (OW): 15°C, 400 μatm CO2, pH = 8.2; 4) Combined warming and acidification (OWA): 15°C, 1000 μatm CO2, pH = 7.85. Copepods were fed equal proportions of the live phytoplankters Tetraselmis sp., Rhodomonas sp., and T halassiosira weissflogii every 48-72 hours to achieve food-replete conditions (≥600 micrograms (μg) Carbon per liter (L)) (Feinberg and Dam, 1998. Marine Ecology Progress Series ), deliberately raised under ambient conditions to avoid confounding effects of possible food quality changes.
The population net reproductive rate, λ, was calculated as the dominant eigenvalue of an assembled projected age-structured Leslie matrix constructed from survival and fecundity data (Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation ). Briefly, day-specific probabilities of survival are calculated from day-specific survival as Px = lx / (lx-1) where lx represents the proportion of individuals on day x and lx - 1 represents the proportion of individuals on day x - 1. Probabilities of survival on day 1 are assumed to be 100%, or a value of 1.0. Per capita EPR and HS are calculated as described in the preceding, with fecundity rates equalling the product of EPR and HS. Because only females produce offspring, total fecundity rates must be scaled to the sex ratio (proportion of females to males). To account for differences in individual development time for each treatment, fecundity rates are assigned to all days after the first matured adult is observed. We assume that surviving individuals represented by the survival experiments are equally as likely to experience any of the fecundity values observed in EPR experiments. Therefore, each mate-pair fecundity rate was paired with each survival beaker to construct a matrix. This yields a maximum of 120 matrices per treatment per generation (3 survival beakers × 4 replicate cultures × 10 mate pairs). Full methods for all traits can be found in: deMayo, et al. 2023. Simultaneous warming and acidification limit population and reveal phenotype costs for a marine phenotype. Proc. R. Soc. B 290: 20231033. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1033
Dataset Citation
- Cite as: Dam, Hans G.; Baumann, Hannes; Finiguerra, Michael; Pespeni, Melissa; Brennan, Reid (2024). Population fitness measurements collected for Acartia hudsonica during multigenerational exposure to ocean warming (OW), ocean acidification (OA), and combined ocean warming and acidification (OWA) from 2017-07-02 to 2018-08-15 (NCEI Accession 0294372). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/0294372. Accessed [date].
Dataset Identifiers
ISO 19115-2 Metadata
gov.noaa.nodc:0294372
Download Data |
|
Distribution Formats |
|
Ordering Instructions | Contact NCEI for other distribution options and instructions. |
Distributor |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information +1-301-713-3277 NCEI.Info@noaa.gov |
Dataset Point of Contact |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information ncei.info@noaa.gov |
Time Period | 2017-07-02 to 2018-08-15 |
Spatial Bounding Box Coordinates |
West: -72
East: -72
South: 41.3
North: 41.3
|
Spatial Coverage Map |
General Documentation |
|
Associated Resources |
|
Publication Dates |
|
Data Presentation Form | Digital table - digital representation of facts or figures systematically displayed, especially in columns |
Dataset Progress Status | Complete - production of the data has been completed Historical archive - data has been stored in an offline storage facility |
Data Update Frequency | As needed |
Purpose | This dataset is available to the public for a wide variety of uses including scientific research and analysis. |
Use Limitations |
|
Dataset Citation |
|
Cited Authors |
|
Principal Investigators |
|
Contributors | |
Resource Providers | |
Points of Contact | |
Publishers | |
Acknowledgments |
|
Theme keywords |
NODC DATA TYPES THESAURUS
NODC OBSERVATION TYPES THESAURUS
WMO_CategoryCode
|
Data Center keywords | NODC COLLECTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS NODC SUBMITTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords |
Project keywords | BCO-DMO Standard Projects Provider Funding Award Information |
Keywords | NCEI ACCESSION NUMBER |
Use Constraints |
|
Data License | |
Access Constraints |
|
Fees |
|
Lineage information for: dataset | |
---|---|
Processing Steps |
|
Output Datasets |
|
Last Modified: 2024-06-27T21:25:02Z
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov