Historical reconstruction of sea urchin grazing events in Aleutian Island ecosystem from grazing scars, 1965-2004 (NCEI Accession 0291925)
This dataset contains biological data collected in the Bering Sea from 2004-08-14 to 2014-07-16. These data include depth and growth. These data were collected by Douglas B. Rasher of Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, James Estes of University of California-Santa Cruz, and Robert S. Steneck of University of Maine as part of the "Ocean Acidification: Century Scale Impacts to Ecosystem Structure and Function of Aleutian Kelp Forests (OA Kelp Forest Function)" project and "Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability NSF-Wide Investment (SEES): Ocean Acidification (formerly CRI-OA) (SEES-OA)" program. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2019-02-25.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Dataset Description:
Historical reconstruction of sea urchin grazing events in the ecosystem, achieved via enumerating the annual frequency of grazing scars that are archived in the calcified matrix of Clathromorphum nereostratum . Intact colonies of C. nereostratum were collected via SCUBA. Reconstructions were performed on polished and imaged sample cross-sections.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Dataset Description:
Historical reconstruction of sea urchin grazing events in the ecosystem, achieved via enumerating the annual frequency of grazing scars that are archived in the calcified matrix of Clathromorphum nereostratum . Intact colonies of C. nereostratum were collected via SCUBA. Reconstructions were performed on polished and imaged sample cross-sections.
Dataset Citation
- Cite as: Steneck, Robert S.; Estes, James A.; Rasher, Douglas B. (2024). Historical reconstruction of sea urchin grazing events in Aleutian Island ecosystem from grazing scars, 1965-2004 (NCEI Accession 0291925). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/0291925. Accessed [date].
Dataset Identifiers
ISO 19115-2 Metadata
gov.noaa.nodc:0291925
Download Data |
|
Distribution Formats |
|
Ordering Instructions | Contact NCEI for other distribution options and instructions. |
Distributor |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information +1-301-713-3277 NCEI.Info@noaa.gov |
Dataset Point of Contact |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information ncei.info@noaa.gov |
Time Period | 2004-08-14 to 2014-07-16 |
Spatial Bounding Box Coordinates |
West: 173.266
East: -178.663
South: 51.409
North: 52.934
|
Spatial Coverage Map |
General Documentation |
|
Associated Resources |
|
Publication Dates |
|
Data Presentation Form | Digital table - digital representation of facts or figures systematically displayed, especially in columns |
Dataset Progress Status | Complete - production of the data has been completed Historical archive - data has been stored in an offline storage facility |
Data Update Frequency | As needed |
Supplemental Information | Acquisition Description: Clathromorphum species produce annual growth increments (hereafter "year bands") in their skeleton (Adey et al. 2013), which contain elemental and isotopic signatures that can be used to reconstruct past oceanographic conditions (e.g., Fietzke et al. 2015). We discovered that such year bands also archive urchin grazing scars, allowing us to measure the timing and frequency of past urchin grazing events on C. nereostratum . Wild specimens of C. nereostratum were thus collected and analyzed in order to reconstruct grazing events in the ecosystem. At each site studied with respect to bioerosion, we collected C. nereostratum specimens (n = 10/site) with hammer and chisel, focusing on individuals without visible signs of grazing on the epithallus. Ship-side, samples were sectioned with a diamond lapidary saw and examined for quality; high quality samples were placed in an oven (50°C) until dry, then archived for subsequent analysis. Samples collected from Amchitka were of poor quality. Hence for Amchitka, we used specimens collected previously (2004) for this exercise. We also augmented our 2014 collections from Attu with samples previously collected (2008) from the same locale, because many of the 2014 samples did not meet our criteria for reconstruction (see below). Each C. nereostratum specimen (n = 5/island) was mounted to a glass slide, sectioned parallel to the growth axis with a diamond lapidary saw, and polished to 3 microns resolution following established methods (Hetzinger et al. 2009). Each section was then imaged with a camera coupled to a reflected light microscope (GeoTS, Olympus Inc.), which obtains a mosaic of overlapping images and stitches them together to produce a single high-resolution image of the cross-section. This photomosaic was used to carefully identify, age, and count grazing scars that occurred along a transect oriented parallel to the alga's growth axis in the plane of the section. We scored multiple (n = 2-3) transects per sample, given that grazing events do not span the entirety of a year band. The origin of each transect was randomly plotted, then moved to the nearest location on the epithallus that was living and that displayed a flat or convex shape. The transect was then plotted through sequentially older year bands, so long as it: (i) did not cross a fusion between two individual algae; (ii) spanned at least 30 years of growth; and (iii) intercepted year bands that were clearly visible. If any of these criteria were violated, the transect was relocated. Along each transect, we aged and measured the growth (vertical extension) of year bands in 5-year intervals, repeating this process so long as dating could be rigorously performed and end-dates aligned for all transects within a sample. Within each 5-year interval, we assessed the annual frequency of grazing scars - which manifest as a jagged interruption of the growth margin coupled with serial pitting of the reproductive conceptacles - found 5 mm to either side of the transect. Straight growth lines that lacked conceptacles or the occasional empty conceptacle within an otherwise clean growth band was not considered evidence of grazing. In instances where one side of the transect entered an area that violated the above criteria (e.g., passed under an area that had a concave epithallial surface), we analyzed only one side of the transect (10 mm). With this methodology remains the possibility that urchin grazing may have removed entire years of growth, thus obscuring our estimates of grazing frequency and the timing of each grazing event. To address this issue, we compared (double blind) our age models for a subset of samples from Alaid and Ogliuga to ages produced using Uranium series dating (Fietzke et al. 2005). Our age estimates were very similar to those produced by Uranium series dating, indicating we did not lose entire years to grazing. We selected the year 1965 as the cutoff for our reconstruction because ecological records are scant prior to this period (Estes et al. 2010). For C. nereostratum samples collected in 2014, we excluded the 10 most recent years of growth (2014-2005) from our analyses due to a known bias in our collection method; since we collected non-grazed specimens from the wild and retained only the highest quality samples, we biased ourselves against finding evidence of grazing in recent years. For samples collected in 2004 and 2008, such a bias was not evident, at least for those records that met our criteria and were used in the study. For the three 2008 samples used, we excluded the first four years to align chronologies with all other specimens. |
Purpose | This dataset is available to the public for a wide variety of uses including scientific research and analysis. |
Use Limitations |
|
Dataset Citation |
|
Cited Authors | |
Principal Investigators | |
Contributors | |
Resource Providers | |
Points of Contact | |
Publishers | |
Acknowledgments |
Theme keywords |
NODC DATA TYPES THESAURUS
NODC OBSERVATION TYPES THESAURUS
WMO_CategoryCode
|
Data Center keywords | NODC COLLECTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS NODC SUBMITTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords |
Place keywords | NODC SEA AREA NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
Project keywords | BCO-DMO Standard Programs BCO-DMO Standard Projects Provider Funding Award Information |
Keywords | NCEI ACCESSION NUMBER |
Use Constraints |
|
Data License | |
Access Constraints |
|
Fees |
|
Lineage information for: dataset | |
---|---|
Processing Steps |
|
Output Datasets |
|
Last Modified: 2024-05-31T18:50:46Z
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov