Coral weight from a study of year-long effects of high pCO2 on the community structure of a tropical fore reef assembled in outdoor flumes in Moorea, French Polynesia from 2017 to 2018 (NCEI Accession 0291914)

This dataset contains biological data collected from 2017-01-01 to 2018-01-01. These data include taxon. The instruments used to collect these data include Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter, Conductivity Meter, Onset HOBO Pro v2 temperature logger, Photosynthetically Available Radiation Sensor, Pump, and pH Sensor. These data were collected by Peter J. Edmunds, Robert Carpenter, and Steve Doo of California State University Northridge as part of the "RUI: Ocean Acidification- Category 1- The effects of ocean acidification on the organismic biology and community ecology of corals, calcified algae, and coral reefs (OA_Corals)" project and "Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability NSF-Wide Investment (SEES): Ocean Acidification (formerly CRI-OA) (SEES-OA)" program. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2024-04-18.

The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:

Dataset Description:
See "Related Datasets" and "Supplemental Files" sections for access to related data published as part of these pCO2 flume experiments published in Edmunds et al., (2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa015).

Related metabolism data was published in Edmunds et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12504).
Methods and Sampling:
Fore reef communities were assembled in three outdoor flumes in Mo'orea, which were assigned randomly to a pCO 2 treatment targeting ambient (400 μatm), 700 μatm, and 1300 μatm pCO 2 . The elevated pCO 2 treatments approximated atmospheric conditions projected for about the year 2140 under representative concentration pathways (RCP) 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5. Treatments were maintained for one year beginning in late Austral spring (November 2017), and actual pCO 2 treatments over the year differed from target values (described below). In brief, each flume consisted of a working section that was 5.0-m long, 30-cm wide and filled to ~ 30-cm depth with ~ 500 L of seawater. The fixed and unfixed communities within each fume occupied a 4.7 × 0.3 m portion of the floor of the working section of each flume. Seawater was circulated continually through a return section, and was supplied with fresh seawater at ~ 5 L min -1 . Seawater was pumped from Cook’s Bay (14-m depth) and filtered through sand (pore size ~ 450–550 µm) before entering the flumes. With this pore size, small particulates passed through the filter and were added to the flumes where they were available as food for heterotrophic organisms.

Fore reef communities:

The reef communities were assembled to correspond to the mean percent cover of the major benthic space holders recorded in 2006 at 17-m depth on the fore reef of the north shore of Mo'orea. A historic community structure (rather than present day) was used because 2006 represented the long-term community structure on this reef, and it created the capacity to compare aspects of the present experiment with a previous experiment. Based on six sites sampled around Mo'orea in 2006, the community structure in the flumes was targeted to ~ 11% cover of Pocillopora spp., ~ 8% massive Porites spp., 8% Acropora spp., and ~ 53% reef rock. This construct created a community with ~ 27% coral cover, which was slightly lower than the actual mean coral cover in 2006 (32%), because the remaining 14 genera of scleractinians and Millepora contributed 5% coral cover. The Pocillopora conformed to the classic morphology of P. verrucosa , but it is likely that other Pocillopora spp. were present in the flumes. Likewise, Acropora spp. were selected to represent A. hyacinthus and A. retusa , which were common on the fore reef when the experiment was completed, and colonies of these species were scattered haphazardly among the flumes. Given the morphological complexity of Acropora spp., it is possible that other species were placed into the flumes. Pieces of coral rubble (~ 11.5-cm diameter) were added to achieve ~ 29% cover. Coral and rubble were haphazardly scattered along the working section of each flume to approach the targets for percentage cover, and this resulted in portions of the flumes having slightly different covers of coral. This was important for the central 2.4-m portion of the flume, where community members were fixed to allow the community structure to be quantified monthly using planar photographs. In the adjacent portions of the flumes, community members were unfixed (and rested on the floor of the flumes) so that they could be removed monthly for buoyant weighing (described below). See related dataset "Edmunds et al. 2020 ICES: pCO2 flume - Coral area" https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/924650.

Corals and rubble were collected from ~ 17-m depth on the north shore fore reef, epoxied (Z-Spar A788, Pettit Marine Paint, Rockaway, NJ, USA) to plastic bases, and placed in a seawater table for at least 2 d before being added to the flumes. This time allowed the epoxy to cure and for the corals to recover from collection. Fore reef communities were assembled in the flumes on 27 October 2017, where they were maintained under ambient seawater conditions until 3 November. At this time, treatment pCO 2 levels were initiated in two flumes (one remained at ambient pCO 2 ), with pCO 2 gradually increased to target values over 24 h.

Physical and chemical parameters (see "Supplemental Files" for data access) :

Seawater was circulated in the flumes at ~ 0.1 m s -1 using a pump (Wave II 373 J s -1 , W. Lim Co., El Monte, CA, USA), and flow speeds were measured across the working sections using a Nortek Vectrino Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter. This flow speed was ecologically relevant for 15-m depth on the fore reef of Mo’orea (14-y mean = 0.065 m s -1 ). The flumes were exposed to natural sunlight that was reduced with a blue filter (LEE #183, Lee Filters, Andover, England) to photon flux densities (PFD) in the range of photosynthetically active radiation (400–700 nm) that approximated those at 17-m depth. Light in the flumes was measured continuously (at 0.0006 Hz) using cosine-corrected sensors (Odyssey, Dataflow Systems Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand) that recoded PAR. Odyssey sensors were calibrated with a Li-COR meter [LI-1400, Li-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA] attached to a 2p sensor [LI 192A]). Temperatures in the flumes were regulated with chillers (heaters were not required) and were maintained close to the mean monthly seawater temperature at 17-m depth on the fore reef.

Seawater carbonate chemistry was uncontrolled in one flume (ambient, ~ 400 μatm pCO 2 ), and controlled in two others to simulate conditions arising from seawater pCO 2 targeted at 700 μatm and 1300 μatm. Seawater pH was not altered in the ambient flume, but was controlled in the treatment flumes by bubbling CO 2 into the seawater to alter pH relative to a set-point (regulated using an Aquacontroller, Neptune Systems, Morgan Hill, CA, USA) that operated a solenoid supplying pure CO 2 gas to a diffuser stone submerged in each flume. A diurnal upward pH adjustment of ~ 0.1 unit was applied to the two treatment flumes to simulate natural diurnal variation in seawater pCO 2 on the reef of Mo’orea. The ambient flume also maintained a diurnal variation in pCO 2 with a night time pH ~ 0.1 unit lower than in the daytime. Ambient air was bubbled continuously into all flumes. Periodic measurements of pCO 2 in the flumes confirmed that nocturnal pCO 2 met, or exceeded day-time target values (described in results publication Edmunds et al., 2020).

Throughout the experiment, logging sensors (described above) recorded PAR, and temperature (Hobo Pro v2 [± 0.2 °C], Onset Computer Corp., Bourne, MA, USA). pH was measured daily on the total hydrogen ion scale (pH T ) using a handheld meter (see below). The values from the temperature and pH measurements were used to adjust the thermostat and pH-set points to achieve target pCO 2 values. Seawater carbonate chemistry (pH and A T ) and salinity were measured during the day (14:00 hrs) and night (20:00 hrs) and were obtained weekly. A bench-top conductivity meter (Thermo Scientific, Orionstar A212, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure salinity. The remaining parameters of the seawater carbonate system were calculated from temperature, salinity, pH T , and A T , using the R package Seacarb.

pH T was measured using a DG 115-SC electrode (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) that was calibrated with a TRIS buffer. A T was measured using open-cell, acidimetric titration using a certified titrant with an automatic titrator (T50, Mettler Toledo) fitted with a DG 115-SC electrode (Mettler Toledo). The accuracy and precision of measurements were determined by processing certified reference materials (CRMs batch numbers 158 and 172; from A. Dickson Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, CA, USA), against which measured values of A T maintained an accuracy of 1.7 ± 0.3 μmol kg -1 ( n = 15) and precision of 1.8 ± 0.1 μmol kg -1 ( n = 475).

Response variables:
* The "Weight" column in this dataset is the dry weight (mass) discussed in the below section which also discusses how Gnet was calculated using the dry weight.

Net changes in mass (Gnet) of corals in the unfixed portion of the community were measured every month by buoyant weighing (accuracy of ± 1 mg CaCO3). The fixed community members were bouyant weighed at the start and the end of the experiment. Buoyant weight was converted to dry weight of CaCO3 using empirical seawater density (~1.02278 g cm-3) , the density of pure aragonite (2.93 g cm-3, corals), and Archimedes Principle (Davies 1989). As the area of tissue changed throughout the year as a result of growth and partial mortality, the change in mass could not be expressed on an area-normalized scale. Gnet at each time therefore was expressed as the percentage change in dry mass relative to the initial dry mass in November 2017 (see Edmunds et al, 2020).

Community structure:

The effects of the treatments on the community structure were described using photographs recorded monthly in planar view. See more details and files in related dataset "Edmunds et al. 2020 ICES: pCO2 flume - Coral area" https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/924650.

Organism identifiers (Taxon, LifeSciences Identifier (LSID), name as appears in Species column):

Acropora hyacinthus, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:207044, A. hyacinthus
Acropora retusa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:430653, A. retusa
Porites, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:206485, Massive Porites
Pocillopora damicornis, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:206953,
Pocillopora verrucosa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:206954,