Relative depredation (binomial) data from a squidpop tethering experiment in summer 2017 in Back Sound, North Carolina (NCEI Accession 0291620)
This dataset contains meteorological and physical data collected in the North Atlantic Ocean from 2017-07-05 to 2017-08-31. These data include air temperature, salinity calculated from CTD primary sensors, and water temperature. The instruments used to collect these data include GPS receiver, Refractometer, and Thermometer. These data were collected by Dr F. Joel Fodrie of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as part of the "Collaborative Research: Habitat fragmentation effects on fish diversity at landscape scales: experimental tests of multiple mechanisms (Habitat Fragmentation)" project. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2019-11-13.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Dataset Description:
Relative depredation (binomial) data from a squidpop tethering experiment in summer 2017 in Back Sound, North Carolina.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Dataset Description:
Relative depredation (binomial) data from a squidpop tethering experiment in summer 2017 in Back Sound, North Carolina.
Dataset Citation
- Cite as: Fodrie, F. Joel (2024). Relative depredation (binomial) data from a squidpop tethering experiment in summer 2017 in Back Sound, North Carolina (NCEI Accession 0291620). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/0291620. Accessed [date].
Dataset Identifiers
ISO 19115-2 Metadata
gov.noaa.nodc:0291620
Download Data |
|
Distribution Formats |
|
Ordering Instructions | Contact NCEI for other distribution options and instructions. |
Distributor |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information +1-301-713-3277 NCEI.Info@noaa.gov |
Dataset Point of Contact |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information ncei.info@noaa.gov |
Time Period | 2017-07-05 to 2017-08-31 |
Spatial Bounding Box Coordinates |
West: -76.588
East: -76.526
South: 34.651
North: 34.703
|
Spatial Coverage Map |
General Documentation |
|
Associated Resources |
|
Publication Dates |
|
Data Presentation Form | Digital table - digital representation of facts or figures systematically displayed, especially in columns |
Dataset Progress Status | Complete - production of the data has been completed Historical archive - data has been stored in an offline storage facility |
Data Update Frequency | As needed |
Supplemental Information | Acquisition Description: For Table and Figure references below, see the document "SquidpopAssay_statistical_analysis.pdf" in the Supplemental Files section. Study Site Selection We conducted our study across eight discrete seagrass meadows (hereafter referred to as landscapes) located in Back Sound, North Carolina (NC), USA (3442′ N to 3439′ N, 7637′ W to 7631′ W) (Fig. S1). All of our sampled landscapes were composed of a mixture of Back Sound's dominant seagrasses: eelgrass and shoal grass, Halodule wrightii (Ascherson 1868) (Yeager et al. 2016). Landscapes were chosen based upon available aerial imagery in Google Earth Pro as of February 19, 2017, and ground-truthed for changes in seasonal seagrass growth/senescence using summer, 2017, drone photography and ImageJ 1.x (Schneider et al. 2012). No discernable differences in landscape fragmentation states (e.g. total area, number of patches) were found between the two aerial imagery sources. All landscapes were relatively shallow (1-1.5 m depth at high tide), reasonably isolated from other seagrass beds (distance to nearest seagrass meadow = 112 17 m [mean standard error]) and were appropriately sized to encompass short-term (e.g., daily, monthly) movements of common seagrass-associated fauna in this system (Yeager et al. 2016). We identified similarly sized landscapes (25882 6592 m2) available in Back Sound by defining the minimum convex polygon surrounding the seagrass meadow, regardless of the total seagrass cover within the polygon. Among eight candidate landscapes of similar size, we defined four continuous landscapes and four fragmented landscapes based on the number of patches, the perimeter-to-area ratio, and the largest patch's percent cover of the total seagrass area (Table 1). Seagrass fragmentation is often naturally coupled with habitat loss (Wilcove et al. 1986), resulting in the mean seagrass area of our fragmented landscapes being nearly half that of our continuous landscapes (Table 1). Thus, our experiment was designed to examine the effects of fragmentation (i.e., the breaking apart of habitat concomitant with habitat loss) rather than fragmentation per se (i.e., the breaking apart of habitat without habitat loss; sensu Fahrig 2003). Squidpop Assays Squidpops were also used to measure relative "depredation" across landscapes (acknowledging that a combination of predation and scavenging may account for observed loss patterns). Squidpops are 1-cm 1-cm squares of dried squid mantle tied to 1-cm segments of 12-lbs test monofilament (Duffy et al. 2015). We attached squidpops to 60-cm long, 0.5-cm diameter, fiberglass stakes. Twenty squidpops were deployed (stakes pushed 50 cm into the sediment to prevent squidpop tangling in seagrass or burial in sediment) within each of the eight landscapes per assay date during July and August (July 5, July 13, July 26, August 8, and August 30). Within each landscape, 10 squidpops were haphazardly placed within seagrass edges, defined as 30 cm (a crab tether length) from the seagrass-mudflat interface. The other 10 squidpops were haphazardly placed in seagrass interiors, defined as ≥1 m from the seagrass-mudflat interface. Only patches with a radius of 1 m or larger were used for squidpops classified as 'interior'. However, patches with a radius of <1 m were used for a portion of our 'edge' squidpops. All squidpops were placed at least 1 m apart. A total of 720 squidpops were deployed (Table S1). Squidpop depredation assays did not occur in June due to lack of dried squid availability. During the first two squidpop deployment cycles we checked squidpop status (present, absent/eaten) at 1 h and 24 h. We observed nearly 100% squidpop removal by 24 h, so for the remaining three deployment cycles we performed status checks at 1 h and 2 h. Point measurements of water temperature (C) were taken in each landscape at the location and time of all squidpop assays hand-held thermometers (Table S1). We chose temperature as our seasonality proxy (Fig. S2) because several other seasonally affected factors including faunal densities correlate with water temperature variability. Additionally, the measurement of temperature is easy, cheap, reliable, and comparable to previous studies. Equipment: Dried squid mantel: whole dried squid from Asian food market Tether materials: EcoStakes – tomato plant stakes 12-lbs test monofilament fishing line Pool noodles – cut into rounds for tether relocation floats Hand-held digital thermometer- LYNCH Waterproof thermometer 39240 Hand-held refractometer-VEE GEE STX-3 Salinity 0-100%o Hand-held Garmin GPSmap 78 |
Purpose | This dataset is available to the public for a wide variety of uses including scientific research and analysis. |
Use Limitations |
|
Dataset Citation |
|
Cited Authors | |
Principal Investigators | |
Contributors | |
Resource Providers | |
Points of Contact | |
Publishers | |
Acknowledgments |
Theme keywords |
NODC DATA TYPES THESAURUS
NODC OBSERVATION TYPES THESAURUS
WMO_CategoryCode
|
Data Center keywords | NODC COLLECTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS NODC SUBMITTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords |
Instrument keywords | NODC INSTRUMENT TYPES THESAURUS BCO-DMO Standard Instruments Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords Originator Instrument Names |
Place keywords | NODC SEA AREA NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords |
Project keywords | BCO-DMO Standard Projects Provider Funding Award Information |
Keywords | NCEI ACCESSION NUMBER |
Use Constraints |
|
Data License | |
Access Constraints |
|
Fees |
|
Lineage information for: dataset | |
---|---|
Processing Steps |
|
Output Datasets |
|
Acquisition Information (collection) | |
---|---|
Instrument |
|
Last Modified: 2024-05-31T15:15:28Z
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov