Initial prey abundances for copepod grazing experiments in the Kaneohe Bay, HI, May-June 2013 (MEPS 2017) (EAGER: Copepod nauplii project) (NCEI Accession 0278422)
This dataset contains biological and survey - biological data collected at lab UHawaii_SOEST during deployment Goetze_2012-2013 in the North Pacific Ocean from 2013-05-27 to 2013-06-05. These data include abundance and biomass. The instruments used to collect these data include Coulter Counter, Flow Cytometer, Fluorescence Microscope, Inverted Microscope, and Turner Designs Fluorometer 10-AU. These data were collected by Erica Goetze of University of Hawaii at Manoa as part of the "New molecular methods for studying copepod nauplii in the field (EAGER: Copepod nauplii)" project. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2021-01-20.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Initial prey abundance and biomass: MEPS 2017
Dataset Description:
Acquisition Description:
From Jungbluth et al. 2017 – MEPS
Prey size spectra and abundance (Coulter Counter)
Initial and final time-point Coulter Counter (CC) samples were taken for prey particle spectra by gently pouring 20 ml from each incubation bottle through a 35 µm cap filter into a clean beaker, then gently back-washing the filter into the experimental bottle to return any nauplii using a small volume of 0.2 µm filtered seawater. From this subsample, triplicate 2 ml volumes were measured with a Beckman Coulter Multisizer III CC with a 100 µm orifice tube, yielding a spectrum of particle sizes from 2–35 µm ESD, as well as quantitative abundance data. These raw data were further processed in R (R Core Team 2016) to streamline binning of prey size groups, for calculations of clearance and ingestion rates, and for statistical analyses.
Prey ESD was converted to biovolume (BV; µm 3), then to carbon (C; pg C cell–1), using the relationship C = 0.216 × BV0.939, which applies well to taxonomically diverse protists (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000). Averages of cell abundance and biomass were binned into 5 prey size groupings (2–5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, and 20–35 µm). The binned, averaged data for initial and final time points for each control and treatment bottle were used to calculate carbon ingestion (I; ng C nauplius–1 h–1) and clearance rates (F, ml nauplius–1 h–1) on each prey size group using the equations of Frost (1972).
Photosynthetic eukaryotes (flow cytometry)
Flow cytometry (FCM) samples (1.5 ml) for photosynthetic eukaryote (PEUK) abundance were taken from the 20 ml subsamples (as described above), preserved in 0.4% paraformaldehyde (final concentration), flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and transferred to a –80°C freezer until processing. Preserved, frozen FCM samples were thawed in batches, stained with the DNA dye Hoechst 34442 (1 µg ml–1, final concentration) (Campbell & Vaulot 1993, Monger & Landry 1993), and analyzed using a Beckman-Coulter Altra flow cytometer for phytoplankton population abundances using fluorescence signals from DNA, phycoerythrin and chl a. Data were grouped into relevant populations using FlowJo (Treestar). PEUK cell abundances were converted to biomass using data from parallel microscopy samples, which showed that the eukaryotic phytoplankton in these samples were dominated by 2 to 3 µm ESD spherical cells, with an average biomass of 1.55 pg C cell–1 (biomass conversions as in Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000).
Nano- and microplankton abundance and biomass (microscopy)
Initial and final samples for nano- and microplankton abundance by epifluorescence microscopy (EPI) were preserved (0.4% paraformaldehyde, final concentration), and kept in the dark and cold (4°C) until filtered within 24 to 48 h. EPI samples (25 or 50 ml) were stained with 0.5 nM proflavin (1 to 2 h prior to filtration), then filtered onto 0.8 µm black polycarbonate filters (Midland Scientific), stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 2 min and mounted on a slide. These slides were frozen at –80°C until digitally imaged within 2 mo of collection.
Digital images of the slides were taken using a color camera (Olympus U-LH100HGAPO) attached to an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus Model BX51 TRF, 400× total magnification), and the software program MicrofireTM (Optronics). For each slide, 3 sequential digital images were taken of 30 random fields, using 3 different excitation/emission filters; one each to illuminate chl a/proflavin (EX450-480; DM500, EM≥515), phycoerythrin (primarily due to Synechococcus), and DNA (EX330-385, DM400, EM>420) fluorescence. Living cells were distinguished from dead cells and debris by the presence of nuclei, and autotrophic and heterotrophic cells were distinguished by the presence of chl a.
Images were analyzed by sizing, counting, and identifying autotrophic and heterotrophic cells 2–10 µm in size until >100 cells were characterized. To evaluate the large (>10 µm) cell abundance and biomass, all >10 µm cells on ¼ of one randomly selected control and treatment slide from each experiment were counted, identified as an autotroph or heterotroph, and measured using a calibrated ocular micrometer. Cell dimensions were used to estimate biovolume (oblate spheroid), and converted to biomass (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000). Diatoms >10 µm were also quantified, but they were never abundant during our experiments (see Table 2).
Ciliate biomass and abundance was estimated by inverted microscopy on samples pre-screened through a <35 µm mesh, preserved with a 1/20 dilution of acid Lugol’s solution (Throndsen 1978), and kept in the dark at room temperature until analysis (~1 yr later) by the Utermöhl technique (Sherr & Sherr 1993). Aliquots of 28 ml from randomly selected control and experimental treatments were settled and their entire contents examined (18 to 87 total cells in sample volume, median 55) with a Zeiss inverted microscope (400× magnification), with digital images taken (Moticam camera and software) for subsequent dimensional analyses. The measured length and width of each cell was converted to biovolume based on the appropriate geometric shapes, and converted to carbon biomass (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000).
Chl a determinations
For chl a, triplicate 305 ml samples were filtered onto GF/Fs (Whatman), flash-frozen (LN2), and kept at –80°C freezer until measurements were made 4 mo later. Chl a (and phaeopigment) was measured using a Turner Designs (model 10AU) fluorometer, using the standard extraction and acidification technique (Yentsch & Menzel 1963, Strickland & Parsons 1972).
For complete methodology, see the Supplemental Files section.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Initial prey abundance and biomass: MEPS 2017
Dataset Description:
Acquisition Description:
From Jungbluth et al. 2017 – MEPS
Prey size spectra and abundance (Coulter Counter)
Initial and final time-point Coulter Counter (CC) samples were taken for prey particle spectra by gently pouring 20 ml from each incubation bottle through a 35 µm cap filter into a clean beaker, then gently back-washing the filter into the experimental bottle to return any nauplii using a small volume of 0.2 µm filtered seawater. From this subsample, triplicate 2 ml volumes were measured with a Beckman Coulter Multisizer III CC with a 100 µm orifice tube, yielding a spectrum of particle sizes from 2–35 µm ESD, as well as quantitative abundance data. These raw data were further processed in R (R Core Team 2016) to streamline binning of prey size groups, for calculations of clearance and ingestion rates, and for statistical analyses.
Prey ESD was converted to biovolume (BV; µm 3), then to carbon (C; pg C cell–1), using the relationship C = 0.216 × BV0.939, which applies well to taxonomically diverse protists (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000). Averages of cell abundance and biomass were binned into 5 prey size groupings (2–5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, and 20–35 µm). The binned, averaged data for initial and final time points for each control and treatment bottle were used to calculate carbon ingestion (I; ng C nauplius–1 h–1) and clearance rates (F, ml nauplius–1 h–1) on each prey size group using the equations of Frost (1972).
Photosynthetic eukaryotes (flow cytometry)
Flow cytometry (FCM) samples (1.5 ml) for photosynthetic eukaryote (PEUK) abundance were taken from the 20 ml subsamples (as described above), preserved in 0.4% paraformaldehyde (final concentration), flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and transferred to a –80°C freezer until processing. Preserved, frozen FCM samples were thawed in batches, stained with the DNA dye Hoechst 34442 (1 µg ml–1, final concentration) (Campbell & Vaulot 1993, Monger & Landry 1993), and analyzed using a Beckman-Coulter Altra flow cytometer for phytoplankton population abundances using fluorescence signals from DNA, phycoerythrin and chl a. Data were grouped into relevant populations using FlowJo (Treestar). PEUK cell abundances were converted to biomass using data from parallel microscopy samples, which showed that the eukaryotic phytoplankton in these samples were dominated by 2 to 3 µm ESD spherical cells, with an average biomass of 1.55 pg C cell–1 (biomass conversions as in Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000).
Nano- and microplankton abundance and biomass (microscopy)
Initial and final samples for nano- and microplankton abundance by epifluorescence microscopy (EPI) were preserved (0.4% paraformaldehyde, final concentration), and kept in the dark and cold (4°C) until filtered within 24 to 48 h. EPI samples (25 or 50 ml) were stained with 0.5 nM proflavin (1 to 2 h prior to filtration), then filtered onto 0.8 µm black polycarbonate filters (Midland Scientific), stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 2 min and mounted on a slide. These slides were frozen at –80°C until digitally imaged within 2 mo of collection.
Digital images of the slides were taken using a color camera (Olympus U-LH100HGAPO) attached to an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus Model BX51 TRF, 400× total magnification), and the software program MicrofireTM (Optronics). For each slide, 3 sequential digital images were taken of 30 random fields, using 3 different excitation/emission filters; one each to illuminate chl a/proflavin (EX450-480; DM500, EM≥515), phycoerythrin (primarily due to Synechococcus), and DNA (EX330-385, DM400, EM>420) fluorescence. Living cells were distinguished from dead cells and debris by the presence of nuclei, and autotrophic and heterotrophic cells were distinguished by the presence of chl a.
Images were analyzed by sizing, counting, and identifying autotrophic and heterotrophic cells 2–10 µm in size until >100 cells were characterized. To evaluate the large (>10 µm) cell abundance and biomass, all >10 µm cells on ¼ of one randomly selected control and treatment slide from each experiment were counted, identified as an autotroph or heterotroph, and measured using a calibrated ocular micrometer. Cell dimensions were used to estimate biovolume (oblate spheroid), and converted to biomass (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000). Diatoms >10 µm were also quantified, but they were never abundant during our experiments (see Table 2).
Ciliate biomass and abundance was estimated by inverted microscopy on samples pre-screened through a <35 µm mesh, preserved with a 1/20 dilution of acid Lugol’s solution (Throndsen 1978), and kept in the dark at room temperature until analysis (~1 yr later) by the Utermöhl technique (Sherr & Sherr 1993). Aliquots of 28 ml from randomly selected control and experimental treatments were settled and their entire contents examined (18 to 87 total cells in sample volume, median 55) with a Zeiss inverted microscope (400× magnification), with digital images taken (Moticam camera and software) for subsequent dimensional analyses. The measured length and width of each cell was converted to biovolume based on the appropriate geometric shapes, and converted to carbon biomass (Menden-Deuer & Lessard 2000).
Chl a determinations
For chl a, triplicate 305 ml samples were filtered onto GF/Fs (Whatman), flash-frozen (LN2), and kept at –80°C freezer until measurements were made 4 mo later. Chl a (and phaeopigment) was measured using a Turner Designs (model 10AU) fluorometer, using the standard extraction and acidification technique (Yentsch & Menzel 1963, Strickland & Parsons 1972).
For complete methodology, see the Supplemental Files section.
Dataset Citation
- Cite as: Goetze, Erica (2023). Initial prey abundances for copepod grazing experiments in the Kaneohe Bay, HI, May-June 2013 (MEPS 2017) (EAGER: Copepod nauplii project) (NCEI Accession 0278422). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/0278422. Accessed [date].
Dataset Identifiers
ISO 19115-2 Metadata
gov.noaa.nodc:0278422
Download Data |
|
Distribution Formats |
|
Ordering Instructions | Contact NCEI for other distribution options and instructions. |
Distributor |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information +1-301-713-3277 NCEI.Info@noaa.gov |
Dataset Point of Contact |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information ncei.info@noaa.gov |
Time Period | 2013-05-27 to 2013-06-05 |
Spatial Bounding Box Coordinates |
West: -157.78
East: -157.78
South: 21.432
North: 21.432
|
Spatial Coverage Map |
General Documentation |
|
Associated Resources |
|
Publication Dates |
|
Data Presentation Form | Digital table - digital representation of facts or figures systematically displayed, especially in columns |
Dataset Progress Status | Complete - production of the data has been completed Historical archive - data has been stored in an offline storage facility |
Data Update Frequency | As needed |
Purpose | This dataset is available to the public for a wide variety of uses including scientific research and analysis. |
Use Limitations |
|
Dataset Citation |
|
Cited Authors | |
Principal Investigators | |
Contributors | |
Resource Providers | |
Points of Contact | |
Publishers | |
Acknowledgments |
Theme keywords |
NODC DATA TYPES THESAURUS
NODC OBSERVATION TYPES THESAURUS
WMO_CategoryCode
|
Data Center keywords | NODC COLLECTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS NODC SUBMITTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords |
Platform keywords | BCO-DMO Platform Names Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords |
Instrument keywords |
NODC INSTRUMENT TYPES THESAURUS
BCO-DMO Standard Instruments
|
Place keywords |
NODC SEA AREA NAMES THESAURUS
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords
|
Project keywords | BCO-DMO Standard Projects Provider Deployment IDs Provider Funding Award Information |
Keywords | NCEI ACCESSION NUMBER |
Use Constraints |
|
Data License | |
Access Constraints |
|
Fees |
|
Lineage information for: dataset | |
---|---|
Processing Steps |
|
Output Datasets |
|
Acquisition Information (collection) | |
---|---|
Instrument |
|
Last Modified: 2024-05-31T18:50:46Z
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov