Direct measure of phytoplankton cell quotas from field populations sampled from multiple cruises cruises between 2010 and 2016 (NCEI Accession 0278105)
This dataset contains chemical data collected on R/V Atlantic Explorer, R/V New Horizon, R/V Roger Revelle, and R/V Sonne during cruises AE1032, AE1226, AE1319, NH1410, NH1418, RR1604, and SO243 in the Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean, Labrador Sea, North Atlantic Ocean, North Pacific Ocean, and South Pacific Ocean from 2010-10-31 to 2016-04-15. These data include depth, particulate organic Carbon (POC), and particulate organic nitrogen. The instruments used to collect these data include CHN Elemental Analyzer, Flow Cytometer, and Niskin bottle. These data were collected by Michael W. Lomas of Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences and Adam Martiny of University of California-Irvine as part of the "Biological Controls on the Ocean C:N:P ratios (Biological C:N:P ratios)" project and "Dimensions of Biodiversity (Dimensions of Biodiversity)" and "Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry (OCB)" programs. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2021-06-03.
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Sorted Cell Quotas
Dataset Description:
Acquisition Description:
Phytoplankton sample collection and preparation. Samples for taxon-specific elemental content were collected using 12 liter (L) Niskin bottles, usually from two depths at each station (see supplemental file for map of stations from which samples were collected and cell-sorted to quantify cellular macronutrient content; one within the upper mixed layer (10-20 meters) and one near the deep chlorophyll maximum. Due to timing of the cruises, samples were collected from a seasonal window limited to summer and early fall. Samples were prepared for sorting by concentrating cells from the ambient sample under darkened conditions using a Memteq High Volume Cell Trap (0.2 micrometer pore size), and then flushed from the Cell Trap using 0.2 micrometer (µm) filtered seawater and a luer lock syringe; roughly 3-4 liters (L) of ambient seawater was concentrated down to ~5 milliliters (mls). Samples were either gravity filtered through the Cell Trap directly from the Niskin bottle or pushed through the cell trap using a peristaltic pump at <50 milliliter per minute (ml min -1 ). Samples were then kept cool at 4 degrees C if they were going to be sorted live and immediately after collection or fixed with freshly filtered paraformaldehyde (0.5% v/v final concentration) if they were going to be stored for later sorting. Samples were allowed to fix at 4 degrees C for 1-2 hours and then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and then moved to -80 degrees C for longer term storage.
Cell sorting and elemental analysis. The cell counting and sorting protocols used follow that of Baer et al. (2017). Cell counts and sorts were performed on either a Becton Dickinson Influx or FACSJazz flow cytometer, each utilizing a 200 milliwatt (mW) 488 nanometer (nm) laser, with detectors for forward scatter, side scatter, 692 nanometer (nm), and 530 nanometer (nm), and operated with 8 grams of NaCL kg -1 solution for sheath fluid, which was filtered inline using a 0.22 micrometer (µm) Millipore Sterivex TM filter. Instrument alignment was performed with 3.0 micrometer (μm) 6-peak rainbow beads, while roughly hourly checks on forward scatter response were performed with 0.53 micrometer (μm) Nile Red beads (Spherotech). Prochlorococcus populations were discriminated based on forward scatter and red fluorescence, and a gate in orange (530 nm) discriminated for Synechococcus . Eukaryotes were all larger autofluorescing cells that did not fit the cyanobacterial gating scheme. For sorting, sort control software was set to "1.0 drop pure" sort mode. In excess of 17 million, 8 million, and 500,000 cells for Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus, and eukaryotes were sorted for chemical analysis, respectively. Not all phytoplankton groups were sufficiently abundant at each station/depth for practical sorting and subsequent analysis. Post-sort purity tests were run with subsamples of each sorted population; sort purity always exceeded 94%. Sorted populations were collected in polystyrene Falcon tubes (BD Biosciences Inc.) and subsequently filtered on pre-combusted (450 degrees C for 4 hours) GF-75 filters (Ahlstrom; nominal pore size = 0.3 micrometer). To ensure complete capture of all of the cells, the Falcon tubes were rinsed multiple times with 0.2 micrometer (μm) filtered sheath fluid. Filter and sheath fluid blanks were produced each day samples were sorted for subsequent subtraction from the mass of each unknown sample. Following filtration, filters were placed in acid-washed cryovials and frozen (-20 degrees C) until analysis as described below. Average cellular elemental content was determined by dividing the elemental content of the sample (see next section) by the number of sorted cells as determined in a direct post-sort count analysis of the sorted sample.
Particulate nutrients. Particulate organic P (POP) was analyzed using the ash-hydrolysis method, with oxidation efficiency and standard recovery tested with each sample run using an ATP standard solution and a certified phosphate standard (OSIL Phosphate Nutrient Standard Solution). Method precision is 1-2% at 5 nanomoles per kilogram (nmol kg -1 ). Samples for POC and PON were acid fumed in a desiccator over concentrated HCl prior to analysis. After acid fuming, POC and PON were determined on a Costech 4010 elemental analyzer or a Control Equipment 440 elemental analyzer, depending on the samples. L-glutamic acid (USGS40) was used for standard curve generation and as a check standard (tolerance of <0.1 microgram) approximately every ten samples and at the end of every instrument run. Empty tin capsules (Costech Analytical Technologies) were cleaned with acetone and dried and run as instrument blanks.
Additional methodological details can be found in Lomas et al. 2021 (currently in revision).
The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:
Sorted Cell Quotas
Dataset Description:
Acquisition Description:
Phytoplankton sample collection and preparation. Samples for taxon-specific elemental content were collected using 12 liter (L) Niskin bottles, usually from two depths at each station (see supplemental file for map of stations from which samples were collected and cell-sorted to quantify cellular macronutrient content; one within the upper mixed layer (10-20 meters) and one near the deep chlorophyll maximum. Due to timing of the cruises, samples were collected from a seasonal window limited to summer and early fall. Samples were prepared for sorting by concentrating cells from the ambient sample under darkened conditions using a Memteq High Volume Cell Trap (0.2 micrometer pore size), and then flushed from the Cell Trap using 0.2 micrometer (µm) filtered seawater and a luer lock syringe; roughly 3-4 liters (L) of ambient seawater was concentrated down to ~5 milliliters (mls). Samples were either gravity filtered through the Cell Trap directly from the Niskin bottle or pushed through the cell trap using a peristaltic pump at <50 milliliter per minute (ml min -1 ). Samples were then kept cool at 4 degrees C if they were going to be sorted live and immediately after collection or fixed with freshly filtered paraformaldehyde (0.5% v/v final concentration) if they were going to be stored for later sorting. Samples were allowed to fix at 4 degrees C for 1-2 hours and then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and then moved to -80 degrees C for longer term storage.
Cell sorting and elemental analysis. The cell counting and sorting protocols used follow that of Baer et al. (2017). Cell counts and sorts were performed on either a Becton Dickinson Influx or FACSJazz flow cytometer, each utilizing a 200 milliwatt (mW) 488 nanometer (nm) laser, with detectors for forward scatter, side scatter, 692 nanometer (nm), and 530 nanometer (nm), and operated with 8 grams of NaCL kg -1 solution for sheath fluid, which was filtered inline using a 0.22 micrometer (µm) Millipore Sterivex TM filter. Instrument alignment was performed with 3.0 micrometer (μm) 6-peak rainbow beads, while roughly hourly checks on forward scatter response were performed with 0.53 micrometer (μm) Nile Red beads (Spherotech). Prochlorococcus populations were discriminated based on forward scatter and red fluorescence, and a gate in orange (530 nm) discriminated for Synechococcus . Eukaryotes were all larger autofluorescing cells that did not fit the cyanobacterial gating scheme. For sorting, sort control software was set to "1.0 drop pure" sort mode. In excess of 17 million, 8 million, and 500,000 cells for Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus, and eukaryotes were sorted for chemical analysis, respectively. Not all phytoplankton groups were sufficiently abundant at each station/depth for practical sorting and subsequent analysis. Post-sort purity tests were run with subsamples of each sorted population; sort purity always exceeded 94%. Sorted populations were collected in polystyrene Falcon tubes (BD Biosciences Inc.) and subsequently filtered on pre-combusted (450 degrees C for 4 hours) GF-75 filters (Ahlstrom; nominal pore size = 0.3 micrometer). To ensure complete capture of all of the cells, the Falcon tubes were rinsed multiple times with 0.2 micrometer (μm) filtered sheath fluid. Filter and sheath fluid blanks were produced each day samples were sorted for subsequent subtraction from the mass of each unknown sample. Following filtration, filters were placed in acid-washed cryovials and frozen (-20 degrees C) until analysis as described below. Average cellular elemental content was determined by dividing the elemental content of the sample (see next section) by the number of sorted cells as determined in a direct post-sort count analysis of the sorted sample.
Particulate nutrients. Particulate organic P (POP) was analyzed using the ash-hydrolysis method, with oxidation efficiency and standard recovery tested with each sample run using an ATP standard solution and a certified phosphate standard (OSIL Phosphate Nutrient Standard Solution). Method precision is 1-2% at 5 nanomoles per kilogram (nmol kg -1 ). Samples for POC and PON were acid fumed in a desiccator over concentrated HCl prior to analysis. After acid fuming, POC and PON were determined on a Costech 4010 elemental analyzer or a Control Equipment 440 elemental analyzer, depending on the samples. L-glutamic acid (USGS40) was used for standard curve generation and as a check standard (tolerance of <0.1 microgram) approximately every ten samples and at the end of every instrument run. Empty tin capsules (Costech Analytical Technologies) were cleaned with acetone and dried and run as instrument blanks.
Additional methodological details can be found in Lomas et al. 2021 (currently in revision).
Dataset Citation
- Cite as: Lomas, Michael W.; Martiny, Adam (2023). Direct measure of phytoplankton cell quotas from field populations sampled from multiple cruises cruises between 2010 and 2016 (NCEI Accession 0278105). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/0278105. Accessed [date].
Dataset Identifiers
ISO 19115-2 Metadata
gov.noaa.nodc:0278105
Download Data |
|
Distribution Formats |
|
Ordering Instructions | Contact NCEI for other distribution options and instructions. |
Distributor |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information +1-301-713-3277 NCEI.Info@noaa.gov |
Dataset Point of Contact |
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information ncei.info@noaa.gov |
Time Period | 2010-10-31 to 2016-04-15 |
Spatial Bounding Box Coordinates |
West: 88.2
East: -40
South: -20.76
North: 55
|
Spatial Coverage Map |
General Documentation |
|
Associated Resources |
|
Publication Dates |
|
Data Presentation Form | Digital table - digital representation of facts or figures systematically displayed, especially in columns |
Dataset Progress Status | Complete - production of the data has been completed Historical archive - data has been stored in an offline storage facility |
Data Update Frequency | As needed |
Purpose | This dataset is available to the public for a wide variety of uses including scientific research and analysis. |
Use Limitations |
|
Dataset Citation |
|
Cited Authors | |
Principal Investigators | |
Contributors | |
Resource Providers | |
Points of Contact | |
Publishers | |
Acknowledgments |
|
Theme keywords |
NODC DATA TYPES THESAURUS
NODC OBSERVATION TYPES THESAURUS
WMO_CategoryCode
|
Data Center keywords | NODC COLLECTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS NODC SUBMITTING INSTITUTION NAMES THESAURUS Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Data Center Keywords |
Platform keywords | NODC PLATFORM NAMES THESAURUS BCO-DMO Platform Names Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords ICES/SeaDataNet Ship Codes |
Instrument keywords | NODC INSTRUMENT TYPES THESAURUS BCO-DMO Standard Instruments Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords Originator Instrument Names |
Place keywords |
NODC SEA AREA NAMES THESAURUS
|
Project keywords | BCO-DMO Standard Programs BCO-DMO Standard Projects Provider Cruise IDs Provider Funding Award Information |
Keywords | NCEI ACCESSION NUMBER |
Use Constraints |
|
Data License | |
Access Constraints |
|
Fees |
|
Lineage information for: dataset | |
---|---|
Processing Steps |
|
Output Datasets |
|
Acquisition Information (collection) | |
---|---|
Instrument |
|
Platform |
|
Last Modified: 2024-05-31T15:15:28Z
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov
For questions about the information on this page, please email: ncei.info@noaa.gov