The Ocean Archive System searches our original datasets as they were submitted to us, not individual points or profiles. If you want to search and retrieve ocean profiles in a common format, or objectively analyzed fields, your better option may be to use one of our project applications. See: Access Data

OAS accession Detail for 0278340
<< previous |revision: 1
accessions_id: 0278340 | archive
Title: Sediment trap flux measurements from the Hawaii Ocean Time-Series (HOT) project at station ALOHA on 2018-04-25 (NCEI Accession 0278340)
Abstract: This dataset contains chemical and physical data collected during deployment HOT_cruises on 2018-04-25. These data include Carbon, Nitrogen, Si, d15N, depth, and particulate inorganic Carbon as Calcite. The instruments used to collect these data include Particulate Organic Carbon/Nitrogen Analyzer, Scale, Sediment Trap, and Spectrophotometer. These data were collected by David M. Karl of University of Hawaii at Manoa as part of the "Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT): Sustaining ocean ecosystem and climate observations in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (HOT)" project and "Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry (OCB)", "Ocean Time-series Sites (Ocean Time-series)", and "U.S. Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (U.S. JGOFS)" programs. The Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) submitted these data to NCEI on 2019-12-11.

The following is the text of the dataset description provided by BCO-DMO:

Particle flux measurements from the Hawaii Ocean Time-Series (HOT)

Dataset Description:
Monthly measurements of particle flux were collected at station ALOHA as part of the HOT program.
Date received: 20191211
Start date: 20180425
End date: 20180425
Seanames:
West boundary: -158
East boundary: -158
North boundary: 22.75
South boundary: 22.75
Observation types: chemical, physical
Instrument types: scale, spectrophotometer, trap - sediment
Datatypes: CARBON, DELTA NITROGEN-15, DEPTH - OBSERVATION, NITROGEN, PARTICULATE ORGANIC CARBON, Silicon
Submitter:
Submitting institution: Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office
Collecting institutions: University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Contributing projects: JGOFS
Platforms:
Number of observations:
Supplementary information: Acquisition Description:
Particle flux was measured at a standard reference depth of 150 m using multiple cylindrical particle interceptor traps deployed on a free-floating array for approximately 60 h during each cruise. Sediment trap design and collection

Methods References:
Winn et al. (1991). Samples were analyzed for particulate C, N, P & Si. Typically six traps are analyzed for PC and PN, three for PP, and another three traps for PSi.

The information below has been copied from the HOT Field & Laboratory Protocols page, found at http://hahana.soest.hawaii.edu/hot/protocols/protocols.html# (last visited on 2018-05-23).

SUMMARY: Passively sinking particulate matter is collected using a free-floating sediment array and, after prescreening (335 µm) to remove zooplankton and micronekton carcasses, the sample materials are analyzed for C, N, P and mass flux (mg m-2 d-1).

1. Principle
Although most of the particulate matter both on the seafloor and in suspension in seawater is very fine, recent evidence suggests that most of the material deposited on the benthos arrives via relatively rare, rapidly sinking large particles (McCave, 1975). Therefore, in order to describe adequately the ambient particle field and to understand the rates and mechanisms of biogeochemical cycling in the marine environment, it is imperative to employ sampling methods that enable the investigator to distinguish between the suspended and sinking pools of particulate matter. This universal requirement for a careful and comprehensive analysis of sedimenting particles has resulted in the development, evaluation and calibration of a variety of in situ particle collectors or sediment traps. The results, after nearly a decade of intensive field experiments, have contributed significantly to our general understanding of: (1) the relationship between the rate of primary production and downward flux of particulate organic matter, (2) mesopelagic zone oxygen consumption and nutrient regeneration, (3) biological control of the removal of abiogenic particles from the surface ocean and (4) seasonal and interannual variations in particle flux to the deep-sea. Future sediment trap studies will, most likely, continue to provide novel and useful data on the rates and mechanisms of important biogeochemical processes.
At Station ALOHA, we presently deploy a free-drifting sediment trap array with 12 individual collectors positioned at 150, 300 and 500 m. The deployment period is generally 72 hours. The passively sinking particles are subsequently analyzed for a variety of chemical properties, including: total mass, C, N and P.
2. Precautions
Because particle fluxes in oligotrophic habitats are expected to be low, special attention must be paid to the preparation of individual sediment trap collector tubes so that they are clean and free of dust and other potentially contaminating particles. Traps should be capped immediately after filling and immediately after retrieval. Pay particular attention to airborne and/or shipboard particulate contamination sources. In addition, the time interval between trap retrieval and subsample filtration should be minimized in order to limit the inclusion of extraneous abiotic particles and the post-collection solubilization of particles.
3. Field Operations
3.1.
Hardware
Our free-floating sediment trap array is patterned after the MULTITRAP system pioneered by Knauer et al. (1979) and used extensively in the decade-long VERTEX program. Twelve individual sediment trap collectors (0.0039 m2) are typically deployed at three depths (150, 300 and 500 m). The traps are affixed to a PVC cross attached to 1/2" polypropylene line. The traps are tracked using VHF radio and Argos satellite transmitters and strobelights. Typically we deploy our traps for a period of 72 hours each cruise.
3.2.
Trap solutions
Prior to deployment, each trap is cleaned with 1 M HCl, rinsed thoroughly with deionized water then filled with a high density solution to prevent advective-diffusive loss of extractants and preservatives during the deployment period and to eliminate flushing of the traps during recovery (Knauer et al., 1979). The trap solution is prepared by adding 50 g of NaCl to each liter of surface seawater. This brine solution is pressure filtered sequentially through a 1.0 and 0.5 µm filter cartridge prior to the addition of 10 ml 100% formalin l-1. Individual traps are filled and at least 10 l of the trap solution is saved for analysis of solution blanks (see sections 4.1 and 5.1).
3.3.
Post-recovery processing
3.3.1.
Upon recovery, individual traps are capped and transported to the shipboard portable laboratory for analysis. Care is taken not to mix the higher density trap solutions with the overlying seawater. Trap samples are processed from deep to shallow in order to minimize potential contamination.
3.3.2.
The depth of the interface between the high density solution and overlying seawater is marked on each trap. The overlying seawater is then aspirated with a plastic tube attached to a vacuum system in order to avoid disturbing the high density solution. Because some sinking particulate material collects near the interface between the high density solution and the overlying seawater, the overlying seawater is removed only to a depth that is 5 cm above the previously identified interface.
3.3.3.
After the overlying seawater has been removed from all the traps at a given depth, the contents of each trap is passed through an acid rinsed 335 µm NitexR screen to remove contaminating zooplankton and micronekton which entered the traps in a living state and are not truly part of the passive flux. Immediately before this sieving process, the contents of each trap are mixed to disrupt large amorphous particles. The traps are rinsed with a portion of the 4. Determination of Mass Flux
4.1.
Three of the 12 traps deployed at each water depth are used for the determination of mass flux. At our shore-based laboratory, triplicate 250 ml subsamples of the time-zero high density trap solution (blank) and equivalent volumes individual traps (start with the deepest depth and work up), are vacuum filtered through tared 25 mm 0.2 µm Nuclepore membrane filters (see Chapter 18, sections 4.1.4 to 4.1.3). The tared filters are prepared as follows:
4.1.1.
Rinse filters three times with distilled water. Place rinsed filter on a 2.5 cm2 foil square (to reduce static electricity) in a plastic 47 mm petri dish.
4.1.2.
Fold the foil in half over the filter and place the petri dish in a drying oven with the lid ajar for 2 hours at 55 °C. Remove and cool in dessicator for 30 minutes.
4.1.3.
Weigh filter to constant weight (i.e., repeat oven drying, cooling and weighing until a relative standard deviation of 4.2.
After the last of the sample has passed through the filter, the walls of the filter funnel are washed with three consecutive 5 ml rinses of an isotonic (1 M) ammonium formate solution to remove seawater salts. During each rinse, allow the ammonium formate solution to completely cover the filter.
4.3.
Return the processed filter to its petri dish, record sample number (on the dish and data sheet), and place in a drying oven at 55 °C for 8 hours. Alternately, store in a dessicator, if an oven is not immediately available. Dry to constant weight (as in Chapter 18, section 4.1.3).

5. Determination of C, N and P Flux
5.1.
The quantities of particulate C, N and P in the prescreened trap solutions are determined using methods described in Chapters 10 and 11. Six replicate traps are used for C/N determinations and three additional traps for P. Typically, 1.5-2 liters are used for a single C/N or P measurement. An equivalent volume of the time-zero sediment trap solution, filtered through the appropriate filters is used as a C, N or P blank

Addendum - PPO4 protocol (April 7, 2015)

The method used for the analysis of particulate phosphate (PPO4) has been modified
and applied to samples analyzed November 2011 (HOT 236) to the present. The previous
protocol was in use over at least the previous 10-year period.

The modified procedure included vortexing of the sample prior to a longer leaching
time (1 hour versus 30 min) of the GFF filter in 0.15 N HCl at room temperature.

Both the previous and modified procedures were tested in paired analyses on samples
collected over one year (12 cruises). The modified procedure resulted in higher yields
by approximately 50% for water column samples (integrated 0-100 m: old method 1.00±0.27
mmol P m-2, versus 1.56±0.14 mmol P m-2) and approximately 30% for P-flux estimated
from sediment trap samples (old method: 0.31±0.07 mg P m-2 d-1 versus
0.40±0.09 mg P m-2 d-1).

Please see the HOT Data Report 2012 for more detail
Availability date:
Metadata version: 1
Keydate: 2023-05-17 12:38:05+00
Editdate: 2023-05-17 12:38:27+00